Pages

Wednesday, September 11, 2019

Weekly Column: Assault Weapons and Farmer's Markets Don't Mix

The following is my column that will appear in the Mt. Vernon Gazette, Springfield Connection, The Prince William Times, The Fort Hunt Herald, and Potomac Local in the week of September 8, 2019.
Every Saturday morning, my father and 12 year-old son go to the Alexandria Farmer’s Market.  My son gets cookies.  My dad gets ham biscuits.  Two weeks ago, they brought me some homemade salsa.  This weekend, they got something else.
Four men in a group called “The Right to Bear Arms” showed up at the Alexandria City Farmer’s Market carrying AR-15 assault rifles outfitted with scopes and bipods for sniping.  According to a video one of the group members, they staged this action to “educate people” about gun rights and “exercising our constitutional rights without fear to do so.”  The video is also filled with the usual references to freedom and the government taking away rights if you do not use them.  He also indicated they intended to do these kind of “monthly walks.”

While the current President has lowered the bar for socially acceptable political conduct and while this was technically legal, this was outrageous.
It never escapes me that Malvo and Muhammad terrorized Northern Virginia for two weeks using an AR-15.  Every time I hear that word, it triggers memories for me of the ten people who were murdered and three others, including a 13 year-old child, who were shot in 2002. 
Those memories have only been reinforced with by the recent carnage inflicted by the AR-15 including Poway, Aurora, Orlando, Parkland, Las Vegas, Sandy Hook, Waffle House, San Bernandino,  Sutherland Springs, El Paso, Tree of Life and Midland/Odesa two weeks ago.  The sight of an AR-15 in public is anything but reassuring. 
These “education lessons” are extremely dangerous.  Perusing a farmer’s market with an assault rifle in a country that sees an assault rifle related mass shooting about six times per year is more likely to promote shock, fear, and terror than it is likely to “educate” anyone.  If anything, the presence of an AR-15 is more likely to incite violence than to deter it.
The United States and Virginia are currently being strangled by a small minority who wield political power orders of magnitude larger than their numbers.  Background checks are supported by over 90% of the public.  “Red Flag Laws” that would allow judges to take guns away from dangerous persons are supported by over 80%.  Law limiting ammunition clips are supported by over 60% of voters.  Assault weapon bans have majority support.  None of these bills are capable of passing Republican-controlled General Assembly or the U.S. Senate because of internal Republican Party politics.
There is no question in my mind that this past weekend’s actions were not done to “educate” anyone – they were done to threaten, intimidate and terrorize a community that believes firearms should be more tightly regulated.  The First Amendment protects speech, but it does not protect physical threats. 
While the vast majority of gun owners are law abiding citizens and would never dream of parading their weapons in public spaces, this incident demonstrates there is a minority who are irresponsible.  Similarly, while most people drive safely, there are others who would be happy to drive 100 MPH on the Beltway.  We have rules to keep our communities safe and control small groups of people who are incapable of being either responsible or exercising self-control. 
Fairfax County, Arlington County and the City of Alexandria (but not Prince William County) already wisely prohibit the carriage of loaded rifles in automobiles, but this incident only underscores the need for the Commonwealth to prohibit the open carry of assault weapons at a minimum at permitted events or at public assemblages.  Alternatively, the Commonwealth should consider allowing localities to regulate the public carriage of assault rifles to consistent with the expectations of each local community.  I am sure we will be taking this up next session in Richmond. 
In the meantime, my advice for this group called “The Right to Bear Arms” is simple: Go home and stay away.  You are doing anything to help your cause.  People go to Farmer’s Markets to buy local food.  They don’t go there for lessons in firearm rights, terrorism, bullying, intimidation or demonstrations of male insecurity. 
Feel free to send me any feedback at scott@scottsurovell.org

1 comment:

  1. I agree with this 100%. A reasonable support of firearms rights would not entail parading around with high powered rifles, rather it would be taking all steps to support legislation that would make sure that only persons responsible enough to own firearms could own them. This would mean supporting all reasonable legislation regulating those rights, including universal background checks, licensing, gun registries, insurance, red flag laws and limitations on the types of guns that can be owned by civilians. We don't live in the wild west. We don't live in a tyrannical state (although it sure seems like it since 1/21/17). There's no need to exercise some sort of hyper-vigilance in one's daily life. The pursuit of life and happiness outweighs the perceived need to carry a firearm at all times.

    ReplyDelete