When the Virginia Board of Education announced accreditation
results based on recent student testing two weeks ago, 13 Fairfax County
schools received a warning. (One of the schools is designed to help learning
disabled children.) Even though the 44th
District has only 7% of the county’s population, half of the county’s warned
schools were in the 44th District: Bucknell, Hybla Valley, Mount Vernon Woods
and Woodlawn Elementary Schools and Mount Vernon High School.
There are many reasons.
Studies show that standardized test scores highly correlate with family
income and if you align the school districts with census blocks, these schools
have a high concentration of some of the lowest-income census tracks in
Northern Virginia.
Children do not choose their family. We owe every child the
best education we can provide. Educated children become productive citizens
which benefits everyone. Struggling
schools also affect everyone including property values, as realtors will
attest.
Turning around these schools requires a multi-faceted
approach, starting with quality pre-schools. There are over 2,000 children in
the U.S. 1 Corridor on waiting lists for Head Start and subsidized childcare.
There are at least 15 preschools between the Potomac River and Route 1, but
zero between Route 1 and Huntley Meadows Park. In the short term, Fairfax
County and Virginia must fully facilitate Head Start, the Virginia Preschool
Initiative and subsidized childcare.
Over the long-term, we need to focus on changing U.S. 1 development
patterns and to diversify our area housing mix. Arlington County and Fairfax
County have redeveloped the Orange Line Corridor without destroying low-and-moderate-income
neighborhoods and created walkable communities with restaurants, shopping and
high quality retail yards away from existing single family homes. The housing
mix has diversified while preserving existing populations.
We can do this in our own community while preserving
historically-significant neighborhoods and affordable housing and maintaining
our sense of place.
The cheapest transit solution would be more bus connections.
While improving bus service might bring some short-term efficiency gains, more
buses will not help Route 1 win the competition for the growing families that
are now moving to Arlington, Ashburn, Leesburg, Reston or Herndon. However, extending the Yellow Line will bring
the kind of focused redevelopment necessary to make Beacon Hill, Hybla Valley
and Woodlawn attractive places for everyone to live, work, and shop that more
buses cannot.
Density will also affect property tax revenue. Fifty percent of our local government budget
goes to our schools and smarter development can mean more real estate tax
revenue generated per square foot of land and less demand for higher taxes on
your home.
Redevelopment also creates what is called “proffer revenue”
– funds that the Board of Supervisors
can require developers to pay to help fund new infrastructure needed supporting
new development. Other parts of the
County have more synthetic turf fields because they were developed after the
proffer laws were enacted. Because proffer revenue typically stays in the
Supervisor district it is generated, redeveloping U.S. 1 will bring new funds
for our parks and schools.
In sum, our schools need more than short-term fixes. The
long-term game changer for our schools and U.S. 1 is extending the Yellow Line.
As we continue to move through the U.S. 1 Multimodal Alternatives
Analysis, it is very important that our community provide feedback not just for
the transit options, but also the amount of density that our community will
accept. If the community opposes the kind of density that has brought Town
Centers to Arlington, Reston, or Fairfax Corner, then our development will only
support more buses and continued struggles with our schools.
I have been reading your posts on the route 1 corridor and extending the Yellow line. Even though I do not live in the route 1 area, I still find this to be an important issue that deserves regional attention. Any money that is not put into investing in a yellow line extension is money down the rat hole. Of course you can have more buses but, is that going to generate new commercial or residential development? Route 1 has the potential of being redeveloped in the vein of the Orange Line's Rosslyn-Ballston corridor, and it should. However that is simply not going to happen with buses. Before the metro extended to Ballston, the Rosslyn-Ballston corridor consisted of used car dealerships and blighted properties, and now, 30 years later it has become a prime example of good land use and meticulous planning. I think the real issue now is how to undertake and finance such an expansion. Of course there will have to be federal funding involved, but maybe its possible to create a tax district for the Route 1 area. Or maybe implement something like a five cent gas tax for Route 1, just to get things started.
ReplyDelete